Abstract
The claims of the preceding Comment [Opt. Lett. 32, 1510 (2007) ] are discussed. It is shown that Kildishev et al. misread the previously presented method [Opt. Lett. 31, 2483 (2006) ] for determining optical constants of nanostructured films. Reasons for a disagreement of the simulations presented in the Comment are also discussed.
© 2007 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Alexander V. Kildishev, Vladimir P. Drachev, Uday K. Chettiar, Vladimir M. Shalaev, Douglas H. Werner, and Do-Hoon Kwon
Opt. Lett. 32(11) 1510-1511 (2007)
A. N. Grigorenko
Opt. Lett. 31(16) 2483-2485 (2006)
S. P. Jamison, A. M. MacLeod, G. Berden, D. A. Jaroszynski, and W. A. Gillespie
Opt. Lett. 32(10) 1343-1344 (2007)